Relations between Information and Communication Technologies and International Migration

  • Vesna Lukić Demographic Research Centre, Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade (Serbia)
Keywords: international migration, information-communication technologies, social media, social capital, migration networks


The paper focuses on the topic of the impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on the international migration phenomenon According to the discussed literature, there is an impression that ICTs change the essence of migration and monitoring of migration flows. It also suggests that migration and migrants’ needs shape the development of ICT services intended to them, but they also shape the content of social media.

The impact of new technologies on international migration (before migration, during migration and upon arrival in the country of destination) has been discussed through an overview of empirical research findings in Serbia and other countries. In this context, the ICT users relevant to the migration process (individuals and interest groups) have been more closely determined and discussed, the aspects of the relations between ICTs and migration have been highlighted, as well as their implications for individuals and society.

The considered aspects of relations of ICTs and international migration at different stages of the migration process and their severe implications for individuals and society, in our opinion, point to the need for cooperation of users of information and communication technologies relevant to the migration process in different domains ‒ the spheres of influence of ICTs. We believe that is how the potential of ICTs will be exploited in an adequate way, for benefit of both ‒ migrants and other relevant interested parties.

While widely accepted by individuals, information and communication technologies have just begun to be recognized as important for migration policy in Serbia and generally, in terms of their opportunities and challenges.

In Serbia, only recently (as of the 2011 Census) there has been data available on the use of ICTs by certain migrant groups (long-term settled refugees from former Yugoslav republics). Also, the qualitative surveys on the use of ICTs during the migration by transit asylum seekers have recently started. That can also be said for the research, where ICTs serve for gaining knowledge on migrants and attitudes towards immigrants.

Although not voluminous, academic literature on the use and implications of ICTs use in the migration process in Serbia points to greater use of ICTs by certain groups of migrants (long-term settled refugees from former Yugoslavia) in relation to the local population. There are also generational and gender differences in the use of ICTs by migrants. When it comes to transit asylum seekers in Serbia, the use of ICTs at various stages of migration and for various purposes (among them are the selection of the country of destination, the route of movement, but also contact with other migrants and smugglers) is observed.


Download data is not yet available.


ANDERSON, J. (2013). Policy Report on UNHCR’s Community Technology Access Program: Best Practices and Lessons Learned. Refuge 29(1): 21‒29.

BACIGALUPE, G., & CAMARA, M. (2012). Transnational Families and Social Technologies: Reassessing Immigration Psychology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38(9): 1425‒1438.

BILGER, V., HOFMANN, M., & JANDL, M. (2006). Human Smuggling as a Transnational Service Industry: Evidence from Austria. International Migration 44(4): 59‒93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2006.00380.x

BENITEZ, J. (2006). Transnational dimensions of the digital divide among Salvadoran immigrants in the Washington DC metropolitan area. Global Networks 6(2): 181‒199. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00140.x

BORKERT, M., CINGOLANI, P., & PREMAZZI V. (2009). The State of the Art of Research in the EU on the Uptake and Use of ICT by Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (European Commission JRC Scientific and Technical reports).

BREKKE, J.-P., & BROCHMANN, G. (2015). Stuck in Transit: Secondary Migration of Asylum Seekers in Europe, National Differences, and the Dublin Regulation. Journal of Refugee Studies 28(2): 145‒162.

BRISKMAN, L. (2013). Technology, control, and surveillance in Australia’s immigration detention centres. Refuge 29(1): 9‒19.

CASTELLS, M. (2005). The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy. In M. Castells and G. Cardoso (eds.), The Network Society: From Knowledge to Policy (pp. 3-23). Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations.

CHARMARKEH, H. (2013). Social Media Usage, Tahriib (Migration), and Settlement among Somali Refugees in France. Refuge 29(1): 43‒52.

CZAIKA, M., & VOTHKNECHT, M. (2014). Migration and Aspirations – are migrants trapped on a hedonic treadmill. IZA Journal of migration 3(1): 1-21.

DEKKER, R., & ENGBERSEN, G. (2014). How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks 14(4): 401-418. DOI: 10.1111/glob.12040

DE HAAS, H. (2014). What Drives Human Migration? In Anderson, B., Keith, M. (eds.), Migration: A COMPAS Anthology. Oxford: International Migration Institute.

DESPIĆ, J. (2015). Migracije visokoobrazovanih lica iz Srbije od 1991. godine u Kanadu i Sjedinjene Američke Države (doktorska disertacija). Beograd: Ekonomski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Beograd.

DIMINESCU, D. (2008). The connected migrant: an epistemological manifesto. Social Science Information 47(4): 565‒579.

ELLIOT, J., & McCARTAN, K. (2013). The Reality of Trafficked People’s Access to Technology. The Journal of Criminal Law 77(3): 255–273.

EUROPEAN COMMISION (2010). The Europe 2020 Strategy. Digital Single Market. Policies. Brussels: European Commission.

HILLER, H. H., & FRANZ, T. (2004). New Ties, Old Ties and Lost Ties: The Use of the Internet in Diaspora. New Media & Society 6(6): 731‒752.

HUNTER, A. (2011). Theory and practice of return migration at retirement: the case of migrant worker hostel residents in France. Population, Space and Place 17(2): 179‒192. DOI: 10.1002/psp.610

KAIZEN, J., & NONNEMAN, W. (2007). Irregular Migration in Belgium and Organized Crime: An Overview. International Migration 45(2): 121‒146. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2007.00406.x

KISSAU, K. (2012). Structuring Migrants’ Political Activities on the Internet: A Two‐Dimensional Approach. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38(9): 1381–1403.

KLUZER, S., HACHE, A., & CODAGNONE, C. (2008). Overview of Digital Support Initiatives for/by Immigrants and Ethnic Minorities in the EU27. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. (JRC Scientific and Technical reports).

KOMITO, L. (2011). Social media and migration: Virtual community 2.0. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(6): 1075–1086. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21517

KOSER, K. (2008). Dimensions and Dynamics of Contemporary International Migration. Paper prepared to the conference “Workers without borders: Rethinking Economic Migration”, Maastricht, Netherlands, March 18, 2008.

LARSEN, J., & URRY, J. (2008). Networking in mobile societies. In J.O. Bærenholdt & B. Granås (eds.), Mobility and Place: Enacting Northern European Peripheries (pp. 89‒101). Aldershot: Ashgate.

LEVITT, P. (1998). Social Remittances: Migration Driven Local-Level Forms of Cultural Diffusion. International Migration Review 32(4): 926‒948. DOI: 10.2307/2547666

LUKIĆ, V. (2014). Korišćenje visokih tehnologija i iregularne migracije. U V. Urošević (ur.), Veze cyber kriminala sa iregularnim migracijama i trgovinom ljudima (str. 523‒557). Beograd: Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova R. Srbije.

LUKIĆ, V. (2015). Dve decenije izbeglištva u Srbiji. Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku.

LUKIĆ, V. (2016). Understanding transit asylum migration: Evidence from Serbia. International Migration 54(4): 31‒43. DOI: 10.1111/imig.12237

MAVRIS, L. (2002). Human smugglers and social networks: transit migration through the states of former Yugoslavia (UNHCR Working Paper, New issues in refugee research, No. 72).

MALIK, S., & KADIR, S. (2011). The Use of Mobile Phone and Internet in Transnational Mothering among Migrant Domestic Workers in Singapore. SSRN Electronic Journal.

MIJALKOVIĆ, S., & ŽARKOVIĆ, M. (2012). Ilegalne migracije i trgovina ljudima. Beograd: Kriminalističko-policijska akademija.

NINAMEDIA RESEARCH (2012). Stav građana opština Mladenovac, Lajkovac i Loznica prema tražiocima azila. CATI istraživanje. Ninamedia Research.

OIARZABAL, P. J., & REIPS, U.D. (2012). Migration and diaspora in the age of information and communication technologies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38(9): 1333‒1338.

PANAGAKOS, A. N., & HORST, H. A. (2006). Return to Cyberia: technology and the social worlds of transnational migrants. Global Networks 6(2): 109‒124.

PREDOJEVIĆ-DESPIĆ, J. (2010). Ka razumevanju determinanti međunarodnih migracija danas – teorijska perspektiva. Stanovništvo 48(1): 25‒48.

RAFTREE, L., APPEL, K., & GANNESS, A. (2013). Modern Mobility: The role of ICTs in child and youth migration. Washington: Plan International.

RINNAWI, K. (2012). “Instant nationalism” and the “cyber mufti”: the Arab diaspora in Europe and the transnational media. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38(9):1451‒1467.

REIPS, U.D., & BUFFARDI, L.E. (2012). Studying Migrants with the Help of the Internet: Methods from Psychology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38(9): 1405–1424.

ROS, A., GONZALES, E., MARIN, A., & SOW, P. (2007). Migration and Information flows: A New Lens for the Study of Contemporary International Migration. Barcelona: University of Catalunya and Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (Working Paper Series WP07-002).

ŠTAMBUK, V. (2008). Politička informatika. Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka 2(2): 289-305.

TIILIKAINEN, M. (2003). Somali women and daily Islam in the Diaspora. Social Compass 50(1): 59‒69.

THULIN, E., & VILHELMSON, B. (2016). The Internet and Desire to Move: The Role of Virtual Practices in the Inspiration Phase of Migration. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 107(3): 257–269. DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12144

VAN DEN BOS, M., & NELL, L. (2006). Territorial bounds to virtual space: transnational online and offline networks of Iranian and Turkish-Kurdish immigrants in the Netherlands. Global Networks 6(2): 201‒220. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00141.x

VERTOVEC, S. (2009). Transnationalism. London and New York: Routledge/ Taylor & Francis Group.

WOOLCOCK, M. M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2(1): 11–17.

How to Cite
Lukić, V. (2017). Relations between Information and Communication Technologies and International Migration. Stanovnistvo, 55(2), 53-68.