Life Satisfaction of Returnee Scholarship Holders in Serbia

  • Nena A. Vasojević Innovation Center, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade (Serbia)
  • Snežana Kirin Innovation Center, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade (Serbia)
Keywords: scholarship holders, returnees, education, job satisfaction, life satisfaction


Educated and talented people drive progress in every country. That’s why no country can neglect these people; that would mean losing one’s own potential. This paper emphasises the importance of educating scholarship students abroad as a means of developing and accumulating human resources and a key determinant of sustainable development in the modern world. Investing in the education of the best students (scholarship holders) is an investment in the future, which brings multiple benefits on a social, economic, and political level. Migration is an important phenomenon that attracts public attention, especially when it comes to highly educated experts leaving their home country in search of better education. Highly educated experts have been leaving Serbia for several decades, which poses an obvious problem for local society. The topic of permanent migration is dominant both in foreign and domestic literature, but studies on the temporary migration of highly educated students (scholarship holders) is almost nonexistent. The aim of this paper is to point out the value of returnee scholarship holders and the importance of creating the appropriate conditions for them to stay in the country.

A survey conducted on a group of 96 returnee scholarship holders identified factors that affect their satisfaction with living in Serbia. The survey involved experts from Serbia who were educated abroad as scholarship holders, where they acquired academic titles and are now employed: as faculty teachers (32); as researchers at scientific institutes (24); in the private sector (21); at universities (12); in state administrative departments (5); and in medical institutions (2). The criterion for selecting this group of respondents was that they had stayed abroad as scholarship holders, whether they used scholarships from domestic (24) or foreign (72) funds. Scholarship students go abroad mostly because of their personal aspirations for training, gaining new experiences, and because of the inability to study the desired discipline in their country, as was the case for 74 respondents. The main reasons for deciding to return are family (25) and the belief that they have a good chance to work in Serbia (18), while 16 respondents could not stay abroad.

In this paper, we used the factor analysis method. The main factors that create satisfaction with life in Serbia are isolated. These factors are: satisfaction with work and a set of factors that strongly correlate with it (the ability to make decisions, the implementation of acquired knowledge, peer acceptance), as well as the recognition of their diploma in Serbia without any difficulties. By improving these factors, there might be a significant increase in the chance that returnee scholarship holders remain in Serbia for a long time. Based on this, it would be wise to build a strategy on how to encourage returnee scholarship holders to stay in the country. The results obtained in this study represent a contribution to a search for a strategy that will attract, involve, and retain educated people in the country.


Download data is not yet available.


Аlbijanić, М. (2011). Intelektualni kapital. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.

Bodrožić, Z. (2014). Povratak visoko-obrazovanih stručnjaka u Srbiju. Psihološka istraživanja, 17(1), 55-75.

Cattell, R. (1978). The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis. New York: Plenum.

European Commission (2010). Europa 2020 strategy.

European Council (2000). Presidency Conclusions. Lisbon European Council.

Everitt, B. (1975). Multivariate analysis: The need for data, and other problems. British Journal of Psychiatry, 126(3), 237-240.

Filipović, J. (2012). Management of a Diaspora Virtual University as a Complex Organization: Serbian Diaspora Virtual University: An Emerging Leadership of a Nation. Saarbrücken, Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

Gavrić, G., Kirin, S., & Čukanović Karavidić, M. (2014). Upravlјanje stresom u preduzetničkim organizacijama kontinuiranim praćenjem perfomansi faktora zadovolјstva zaposlenih. Zbornik radova Međunarodna konferenciji o društvenom i tehnološkom razvoju, God III(1) (str. 19-24). Banja Luka: Univerzitet za poslovni inženjering i menadžment.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Grečić, V. (2005). Knowledge management: a new strategy for “using minds” from the diaspora. In B. Inić (Ed.) Business intelligence: the basic success of management in global terms (pp. 187-210). Belgrade: Faculty of Commerce and Banking.

King, R. (2000). Generalizations from the history of return migration. In B. Ghosh (Ed.), Return migration: Journey of hope and despair? (pp. 7-55). Geneva: UN & IOM.

Kline, P. (1994). An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. New York: Routledge.

Jovanović Gavrilović, B., & Radivojević, B. (2017). Obrazovanje stanovništva za budućnost i budućnost obrazovanja. Stanovništvo, 55(1), 63-85.

Jöns, H. (2009). ‘Brain circulation’ and transnational knowledge networks: studying longterm effects of academic mobility to Germany, 1954-2000. Global networks, 9(3), 315-338.

Lin, X. (2010). The diaspora solution to innovation capacity development: Immigrant entrepreneurs in the contemporary world. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(2), 123-136.

Lee, J., & Kim, D. (2010). Brain gain or brain circulation? U.S. doctoral recipients returning to South Korea. Higher education, 59(5), 627-643.

Matejić-Đuričić, Z., & Filipović, M. (2014). Ekspanzija školovanja: realnost i privid jednakih šansi u dostupnosti obrazovanja. Sociološki pregled, 48(1), 87-103.

Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Office of the European Union (2014). The Erasmus Impact Study. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Pearson, R., & Mundfrom, D. (2010). Recommended Sample Size for Conducting Exploratory Factor Analysis on Dichotomous Data, Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 9(2), 359-368.

Službeni glasnik (2005). Strategija naučnog i tehnološkog razvoja Republike Srbije za period od 2010. do 2015. godine. br. 110/05 i 50/06 –ispravka.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, C. S. (2011). Economic Development. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.

Vasojević, N., Krnjaić, Z., & Kirin, S. (2018). Stipendisti školovani u inostranstvu: povratnici u akademskoj zajednici u Srbiji. Sociološki pregled, 52(3), 938-959.

Vasojević, N., Kirin, S., & Marković, Pj. (2018). Research on scholarships holders who studies abroad and returned to Serbia. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 23 (1), 23-32.

Vasojević, N., & Filipović, M. (2017). Medical students, beneficiaries of the state scholarships of the Republic of Serbia, and their education in the 21st century: The possibility of improvement. Sociologija, 59(2), 189‒205.

Verbić, S. (2016). Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia for the period 2016-2020. Beograd: Ministarstvo prosvete, nauke i tehnološkog razvoja Republike Srbije.

Vujić, D. (2008). Menadžment lјudskih resursa i kvalitet: lјudi ‒ klјuč kvalitet uspeha. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju.

World Bank (2015). World economic forum global competitiveness report 2015–2016.

World Bank (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018.

How to Cite
Vasojević, N., & Kirin, S. (2019). Life Satisfaction of Returnee Scholarship Holders in Serbia. Stanovnistvo, 57(2), 71-86.