Organisational culture in Romania: The fine line between success and failure for women in academia

  • George Marian Ichim Department of Sociology and Social Work, Philosophy and Social-Political Sciences Faculty, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi, Iaşi (Romania)
Keywords: personal satisfaction, academic performance, management position, male stereotypes, work-life balance


Experiences of discrimination in the academic world discourage women from taking part in contests to occupy higher academic positions. People tend to evaluate academic management based on what they consider to be normal behaviour for both women and men. Because of this, women are often perceived as less appropriately equipped to occupy an academic managerial position than men, especially in fields (such as the academic field) where male stereotypes are regarded as more efficient.

This research was intended to evaluate the organisational culture and environment within the largest university centres in Iaşi (Romania) in relation to the accomplishment and execution of academic and scientific tasks by academic staff, as well as measuring their personal and professional satisfaction. We used a qualitative method (the ‘life story’ interview), as we wanted to identify certain events and defining traits of women in academia by focusing on their subjective experiences. For this purpose, we took into account the following three indicators: professional motivation and satisfaction, balancing personal and professional life, and success and failure in the academic world.

Focusing on the obstacles women meet in their attempt to reach scientific/academic management positions, we have noticed that one of the major difficulties women in the academic world are confronted with when becoming academic managers is creating a balance between family life and their career. The interviewed women are not willing to give up domestic tasks for the benefit of professional tasks, as they are part of the traditional family model. On the other hand, this study shows that these women do not lack motivation to take up a managerial position, but that the norms promoted in the academic environment disadvantage women, despite the fact that the interviewees consider these formal norms to be gender-neutral.


Download data is not yet available.


Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(2), 151–169.

Amstad, F., & Semmer, N. (2011). Spillover and crossover of work- and family-related negative emotions in couples. Journal Psychologie des Alltagshandelns, 4(1), 43–55.

Atkinson, R. (2002). The Life Story Interview. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of Interview Research (pp. 121–140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Balahur, D., & Balahur, P. (2010). Women and tehnological education: A European comparative perspective. The 10 commends to the policy makers. In D. Balahur & P. Fadjukoff (Eds.), Women and technological education: A european comparative perspective. The 10 commends to the policy makers (pp. 72–161). Iasi: Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Press.

Baumgartner, M., & Schneider, D. (2010). Perceptions of women in management: a thematic analysis of razing the glass ceiling. Journal of Career Development, 37(2), 559–576.

Benschop, Y., & Doorewaard, H. (1998). Six of one and half a dozen of the other: The gender subtext of taylorism and team-based work. Gender, Work & Organization, 5(1), 5–18.

Benschop, Y., van den Brink, M., Doorewaard, H., & Leenders, J. (2013). Discourses of ambition, gender and part-time work. Human Relations, 66(5), 699–723.

Ceci, S., Williams, W., & Barnett, S. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218–261.

Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies (2010). Work-family conflict not just a women’s issue: helping all employees find work-life balance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, ILR School (CAHRS Research Link No. 5).

Chandler, D. (2011). What women bring to the exercise of leadership. Journal of Strategic Leadership, 3(2), 1–12.

Clarke, M., Hyde, A., & Drennan, J. (2013). Professional identity in higher education. In B. M. Kehm & U. Teichler (Eds.), The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges (pp. 7–21). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Creswell, J. (2005). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

De Vries, J. (2010). A realistic agenda? Women only programs as strategic interventions for building gender equitable workplaces (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from the University of Western Australia.

Fox, M. F., Fonseca, C., and Bao, J. (2011). Work and family conflict in academic science: patterns and predictors among women and men in research universities. Social Studies of Science, 41(5), 715–735.

Gardiner, M., Tiggemann, M., Kearns, H., & Marshall, K. (2007). Show me the money! An empirical analysis of mentoring outcomes for women in academia. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(4), 425–442.

Gasser, C., & Shaffer, K. (2014). Career development of women in academia: traversing the leaky pipeline. The Professional Counselor, 4(4), 332–352.

Greenhaus, J. H., Collins, K. M., & Shaw, J. D. (2003). The relation between work-family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 63(3), 510–531.

Harper, E. P., Baldwin, R. G., Gansneder, B. G., & Chronister, J. L. (2001). Full-time women faculty off the tenure track: Profile and practice. The Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 237–257.

Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: working parents and the revolution at home. New York, NY: Viking Penguin Press.

Ibarra, H., Ely, R. J., & Kolb, D. M. (2013, September). Women rising: the unseen barriers. Harvard Business Review, 91(9), 60–66.

Marston, S., & Brunetti, G. (2009). Job satisfaction of experienced professors at a liberal arts college. Project Innovation, 130(2), 323–347.

Mathew, R. V., & Panchanatham, N. (2011). An exploratory study on the work-life balance of women entrepreneurs in South India. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 77–105.

Noback, I., Broersma, L., &Van Dijk, J. (2016). Climbing the ladder: gender-specific career advancement in financial services and the influence of flexible work-time arrangements. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(1), 114–135.

O’Connor, P. (2011). Irish Universities: Male Dominated? Limits and Possibilities for Change? Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31(1), 83–96.

O’Laughlin, E. M., & Bischoff, L. G. (2005). Balancing parenthood and academia: work/family stress as influenced by gender and tenure status. Journal of Family Issues, 26(1), 79–106.

Peterson, H. (2014). An academic ‘glass cliff’? exploring the increase of women in Swedish higher education management. Athens Journal of Education, 1(1), 33–44.

Piercy, K. W. (2004). Analysis of semi-structured interview data. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Social Science Methodology. Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Pyke, J. (2013). Women, choice and promotion or why women are still a minority in the professoriate. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(4), 444–454.

Rhoten, D., & Pfirman, S. (2007). Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy, 36(1), 56–75.

Richman, L. S., vanDellen, M., & Wood, W. (2011). How women cope: being a numerical minority in a male-dominated profession. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 492–509.

Rosser, V. (2005). Measuring the change in faculty perceptions over time: An examination of their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 81–107.

Sabharwal, M., & Corley, E. (2009). Faculty job satisfaction across gender and discipline. The Social Science Journal, 46(3), 539–556.

Scheele, A. (2005). The future of work – What kind of work? Impacts of gender on the definition of work and research methodology. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 11(1), 14–25.

Schippers, M., & Grayson Sapp, E. (2012). Reading Pulp Fiction: Embodied femininity and power second and third wave feminist theory. Feminist Theory, 13(1), 27–42.

Thompson, C. A., & Prottas, D. J. (2006). Relationships among organisational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(1), 100–118.

Tomas, M., Lavie, J. M., del mar Duran, M., & Guillamon, C. (2010). Women in academic administration at the university. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 38(4), 487–498.

Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Van den Brink, M., Holgersson, C., Linghag, S., & Dee, S. (2016). Inflating and down playing strengths and weaknesses: Practicing gender in the evaluation of potential managers and partners. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 32(1), 20–32.

Van den Brink, M., & Stobbe, L. (2014). The support paradox: Overcoming dilemmas in gender equality programs. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(2), 163–174.

Wilson, R. (2012, June 3). Why Are Associate Professors So Unhappy? The Chronicle of Higher Education.

How to Cite
Ichim, G. (2020). Organisational culture in Romania: The fine line between success and failure for women in academia. Stanovništvo, 58(2), 23-41.