Value- and reflection-based approach to indicators of Orthodox religiosity of the population

  • Sergey Lebedev Institute of Social Sciences and Mass Communications, BelGU, Belgorod (Russian Federation)
  • Mirko Blagojević Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade (Serbia)
  • Elena Pokaninova Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow (Russian Federation)
Keywords: religiosity, sociological criteria of religiosity, indicators of religiosity, Orthodoxy, value- and reflection-based approach

Abstract

In the contemporary sociology of religion that focuses on the study of Orthodox religiosity, especially in Russia and partly in Serbia, there are different theoretical and methodological approaches to assessing the criteria of orthodox religiosity in the population. Two criteria can be identified as paradigmatic cases: the first one could be called the classical or positivist approach and the second one could be named the alternative or phenomenological approach. Researchers who advocate the first approach believe that the criterion of religiosity must include some practical confirmation of the expressed cultural religiosity of the respondents or the population in general. Therefore, it is not enough to identify oneself as a believer or simply align oneself with a particular confessional community. Instead, this subjective position should be confirmed by objective facts such as the regular practice of religious rituals and ceremonies. Proponents of this approach argue that if we do not adhere to this, then the established number of believers is just fictional without any real content, and thus established believers are actually just imaginary believers.

For supporters of the phenomenological approach to the criteria of Orthodox religiosity, the crucial criterion is the self-identification of the respondents and their awareness of belonging to a religious or confessional group. Authors of this persuasion do not talk so much about religiosity, but instead introduce the notion of churchiness, which is not a discrete position – nor a fixed current state, like religiosity is considered among the first group of researchers – but a process that begins at a certain point in time and more or less approaches the ideal requirements that a real, profoundly churched, true (Orthodox) believer should fulfil.

The authors compare and analyse these approaches in the text, while at the same time presenting the rationale for a third method: the integral value- and reflection-based approach. This approach to the sociological criteria of religiosity is based on concepts of reflection, choice, and context. The criterion of religiosity is proposed as a stable, irreversible intention for immersion of a social actor into a religious context. As such, immersion into the very "core" of religion becomes a basic indicator of a person’s religious value-based orientation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauman, Z. (1993). Filosofiya i postmodernistkaya sociologiya, per. s angl., Voprosi filosofii, 3, 46–61.

Belyaeva, L. A., Zdravomislov, A. G., Lapin, N. I., & Naumova, N. F. (1996). Dinamika cennostey naseleniya reformiruemoy Rossii. Moskva: Editorial URSS.

Berger, P. (1990). Ponimanie sovremenosti. Sociologičeskie issledovaniya, 7, 127–133.

Berger, P. L. (1999). The Desecularization of the World: A Global Overview. U P. L. Berger (ur.), The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics (str. 1‒18). Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Blagojević, M. (2015). Vitalnost relgije u (de)sekularizovanom društvu. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka.

Bogačyov, M. I. (2016). K voprosu o formirovanii inegralnogo podhoda k konceptualizacii religioznosti. Svet Hristov prosvešaet vseh: almanah Svyato-Filaretskogo pravoslavnogo hristianskogo instituta, 18, 9–26.

Breskaya, O. Ju. (2011). Izučenie religioznosti: k neobhodimosti integralnogo podhoda. Sociologičeskie issledovaniya, 12, 77–87. https://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/2011-12/Breskaya.pdf

Batirin, G. N., & Žilina, L. N. (2008). Kommunikaciya i obrazovanie. Moskva: Gardariki.

Gegel, G. V. F. (1977). Filosofiya religii, V 2-h tomah. Moskva: Misl.

Giddens, E. (2011). Posledstviya sovremennosti. Moskva: Praksis.

Glagolev, V. S. (2004). Istoričeskie i sovremennie funkcii religioznoy tradicii v Rossii. Reliya v izmenyašey Rossii. Materiali Rossiyskoy naučno-praktičeskoy konferencii. V 2 t., T. 1. Perm: Izd-vo PGTU.

Golicin, G. A., & Petrov, V. M. (2005). Socialnaya i kulturnaya dinamika: dolgo-vremennee tendencii. Infomacinniy podhod. Moskva: KomKniga.

Divisenko, K. S., & Divisenko, O. V. (2016). Biografičeskoe issledovanie reinterpretacii ličnoy istorii u pravoslavnih veruyuših. Žurnal sociologii i socialnoy antropologii, 19(4), 24–37.

Dubin, B. V. (2005). Drugaya istoriya. Kultura kak sistema vosproizvodstva. Otečestvennie zapiski, 4(25). http://www.strana-oz.ru/2005/4/drugaya-istoriya-kultura-kak-sistema-vosproizvodstva

Dubin, B. V. (2007). Žit v Rossii na rubeže stoletiy. Sociologičeskie očerki i razrabotki. Moskva: Progress – Tradiciya.

Ilin, I. A. (2002). Aksiomi religioznogo opita. Moskva: OOO „Izdatelstvo AST“.

Isaeva, V. B. (2013). Sociologičeskie issledovaniya religioznoy konversii v zarubežnoy naučnoy tradicii: klassičeskie konceptualnie modeli. Naučno obozrenie, Seriya 2: Gumanitarnie nauki, 6(122), 28–36.

Yablokov, I. N. (2017). Religioznost. U М. Yu. Smirnov (ur.), Enciklopedičeskiy slovar sociologii religii (str. 272-275). SPb.: Platonovskoe filosofskoe obšestvo.

Kargina, I. G. (2014). Sociologičeskie refleksii sovremenogo religioznogo plyuralizma. Moskva: MGMO, Universitet.

Kaariaynen, K. & Furman, D. (ur.). (2007). Novie cerkvi, starie veruyušie: starie cerkvi, novie veruyušie (Religiya v postsovetskoy Rossii). Moskva: SPb.: Letniy sad.

Kasyanova, K. (2003). O russkom nacionalnom haraktere. Moskva: Akademičeskiy Proekt; Ekaterinburg, Delovaya kniga.

Kublickaya, E. A. (2009). Osobenosti religioznosti v soveremennoy Rossii. Sociologičeskie issledovaniya, 4, 96–107. https://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/2009-04/Kublizkaya.pdf

Lebedev, S. D. (2010). Parodoksi religioznosti v mire pozdengo moderna. Sociologičeskie issledovaniya, 12, 85–94. https://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/2010-12/Lebedev.pdf

Lopatkin, R. A. (1996). Sociologičeskoe izučenie religioznoy situacii i gosudarstvenno-cerkovnih otnošeniy. U F. G. Ovnisenko, M. I. Odincov, N. A. Trofičuk (ur.), Gosudarstveno-cerkovnie otnošeniya v Rossii: Opit prošlogo i sovremenoe sostoyanie (str. 190–223). Moskva: Izd-vo RAGS.

Lopatkin, R. A. (2017). Religioznost. U М. Yu. Smirnov (ur.), Enciklopedičeskiy slovar sociologii religii (str. 267‒269). SPb.: Platonovskoe filosofskoe obšestvo.

Mčedlov, M. P. (2005) Religiovedčeskie očerki. Religya v duhovnoy i obšestvenno-političkeskoy žizni sovremenoy Rossii. Moskva: Naučnaya kniga.

Ostrovskaya, Е. А. (2017). Religioznost. U М. Yu. Smirnov (ur.), Enciklopedičeskiy slovar sociologii religii (str. 269‒271). SPb.: Platonovskoe filosofskoe obšestvo.

Prutskova, E. V . (2012). The Concept of Religiosity: Operationalization in Empirical Research (na ruskom), Gosudarstvo, Religiya, Cerkov v Rossii i za rubežom, 2(30), 268–293. http://www.religion.ranepa.ru/en/node/157

Prutckova, E. V. & Markin, K. V. (2017). Tipology of Orthodox Russians: Тhe Problem of Constructing a Generalized Religiosity Indicator (na ruskom), Sociologičeskie issledovaniya, 8, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0132162517080116

Rutkevič, E. D. (2014). Sociology of Spirituality: Problems of Creation (na ruskom), Vestnik Instituta sociologii RAN, 2(9), 36–65. https://www.vestnik-isras.ru/files/File/Vestnik_2014_9/Rutkevich.pdf

Rutkevič, E. D. (2017). Religioznost. U М. Yu. Smirnov (ur.), Enciklopedičeskiy slovar sociologii religii (str. 271‒272). SPb.: Platonovskoe filosofskoe obšestvo

Sinelina, Yu. Yu. (2011) Cikli sekulyarizacii v istorii Rossii. Sociologičeskiy analiz: konec XVII – načalo XXI veka. Saarbrücken: LAPLambert Academia Publishing.

Smirnov, M. Yu. (2015). Vozmožno li otkazatscya ot koncepta religioznosti pri issledovanii religii? Vestnik Russkoy hristianskoy gumanitarnoy akademii, 16(2), 145–153. http://religjourn.ru/nauka/post-227/

Smirnov, M. Yu. (ur.). (2017). Enciklopedičeskiy slovar sociologii religii. SPb.: Platonovskoe filosofskoe obšestvo.

Sorokin, P. A. (2000). Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya dinamika. SPb: RKhGI.

Ulyanov, L. N. (1971). Opit issledovaniya motivacii religioznogo povedeniya: Na matariyalah sociologičeskogo issledovaniya v Zemetčenskom rayone Penzenskoy oblasti. Voprosi naučnogo ateizma, Vip. 11 (str. 219–221). Москва: Мысль.

Česnokova, V. F. (2005). Tesnim putem: Proces vocerkovleniya naseleniya Rossii v konce XX veka. Moskva: Akademičeskiy Proekt.

Published
2020-05-07
How to Cite
Lebedev, S., Blagojević, M., & Pokaninova, E. (2020). Value- and reflection-based approach to indicators of Orthodox religiosity of the population. Stanovnistvo, 58(1), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV200322002L
Section
Articles