Transnational competences and cultural capital: the experiences of two groups of highly educated returnees to Serbia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of the transnational competencies and cultural capital of migrants, as well as the mechanism of their transfer after returning to their countries of origin, based on Bourdieu’s conception of cultural capital. Using the example of two groups of highly educated returnees to Serbia – scientists and artists – the paper analyses the possibilities of the reproduction of cultural capital in a new, transnational context, between countries of origin and destination, as well as processes of transformation and the creation of new forms of cultural capital.
Returning to Serbia was a transnational experience for a large number of respondents. This process was gradual, despite their expressed desire to return to live and work in Serbia. In some cases, it lasted for years, or the respondents were professionally present in both communities at the same time. Establishing themselves in several different societies enabled the respondents to open new transnational fields in which cultural capital was transformed and upgraded. This significantly helped them to better understand the differences in the functioning of the society of origin and destination, as well as to develop innovative opportunities to apply better communication and/or transfer knowledge and skills between the two settings. New forms of cultural capital have helped a large number of respondents come to the realisation that getting to know new cultures and improving communication with them brings new qualities and opportunities for global positioning in a professional sense. They also influence the formation of new life aspirations and missions that can spread new cultural practices that are relevant to the wider community.
The results of the research show that the two observed groups of highly skilled returnees differ somewhat in the way they have access to institutional support in the process of transferring cultural capital. Artists, especially if they work as freelancers upon their return to Serbia, have a significantly lower opportunity to use institutional support than researchers in science and teaching staff in tertiary education institutions. In that sense, they rely more on social capital, i.e. informal migrant networks, and in that way they look for ways to transform their cultural capital into economic capital. On the other hand, scientific institutes and universities have a relatively high degree of academic engagement and cooperation at both the national and international levels. Therefore, they possess elements of the transnational social field, that is, they represent multiple intertwined networks of professional and social relations through which scientists have the opportunity to exchange, organise, and transform ideas, practices, and resources. Although these processes take place in an uneven way, especially in the transnational context, they provide an opportunity to develop cosmopolitan, transnational cultural capital through the interaction of different types of competencies, which can be transformed into other forms of capital. Finally, it should be noted that the conclusions of this empirical research are based on a non-representative sample and cannot be generalised.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Published by the Institute of Social Sciences - Center for Demographic Research
References
Al-Ali, N., Black, R. and Koser, K. (2001). The limits to ‘transnationalism’: Bosnian and Eritrean refugees in Europe as emerging transnational communities, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2(4), 578–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120049798
Bakewell, O. (2008). „Keeping Them in Their Place”: The Ambivalent Relationship between Development and Migration in Africa, Third World Quarterly, 29(7), 1341–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802386492
Bauböck, R. and Faist, T. (Eds) (2010). Diaspora and transnationalism: Concepts, theories and methods (Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam Press).
Bartel, C.A. and Garud R. (2009). The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization Science. 20 (1): 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0372
Bauder, H. (2003). „Brain Abuse” or the Devaluation of Immigrant Labour in Canada, Antipode 35(4): 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-8330.2003.00346.x
Baxter, J., and Eyles, J. (1997). Evaluating Qualitative Research in Social Geography: Establishing ‘Rigour’ in Interview Analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4): 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1997.00505.x
Beck, U. (2002). The cosmopolitan society and its enemies. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(1-2): 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640201900101
Beck, U. (2008). Mobility and the cosmopolitan perspective, in Canzler, W., Kaufmann, V. and Kesselring, S. (eds) Tracing Mobilities. Towards a Cosmopolitan Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate, 25–35.
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups, Theory and Society, 14(6), 723–744.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J.G. (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education. Greenwood Press, New York, pp. 241–258.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Calhoun, C. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 14(3), 427–448. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2008.00359.x
De Haas, H. (2005). International Migration, Remittances and Development: Myths and Facts, Third World Quarterly, 26 (8), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500336757
De Haas, H. (2014). „Migration Theory. Quo Vadis?”, IMI Working Papers Series, No. 100.
Despić, J. (2015). Migracije visokoobrazovanih lica iz Srbije od 1991. godine u Kanadu i Sjedinjene Američke Države. Odbranjena doktorska disertacija. Beogard: Ekonomski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu. https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:11168/bdef:Content/download
Erel, U. (2010). Migrating Cultural Capital: Bourdieu in Migration Studies. Sociology, 44(4), 642–660, DOI: 10.1177/0038038510369363
Erickson, R. and Eva, R. (2019). When Home Won’t Let You Stay: Migration Through Contemporary Art. New Haven and London: Institute of Contemporary Art/Boston in Association with Yale University Press.
Erkmen, T.D. (2018) Stepping into the global: Turkish professionals, employment in transnational corporations, and aspiration to transnational forms of cultural capital, Current Sociology,66(3), 412–430. DOI: 10.1177/0011392116653236
Fischer, C. and van Houte, M. (2020). Dimensions of agency in transnational relations of Afghan migrants and return migrants. Migration Studies, 8(4), 554–572, https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz012
Fusch P. and Ness, L. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1208–1416.
Glick Schiller, N. (2000). „Building a Transnational Perspective on Migration“, paper peresented at the Conference on Transnational Migration: Comparative Theory and Research Perspectives. ESRC Transnational Communities Programme, June, Oxford, UK.
Gu, Q. and Schweisfurth, M. (2015). Transnational connections, competences and identities: experiences of Chinese international students after their return ‘home’ British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 947–970. DOI: 10.1002/berj.3175
Heusinkveld, P. R. (Ed.). (1997). Pathways to culture. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
Ho, M. and Bauder, H. (2012). We are Chameleons: Identity Capital in a Multicultural Workplace. Social Identities, 18 (3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2012.661997
Jarvis, J.A. (2020). Lost in Translation: Obstacles to Converting Global Cultural Capital to Local Occupational Success. Sociological Perspectives, 63(2), 228–248. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0731121419852366
Kalm, S. (2020). Citizenship Capital. Global Society, 34(4), 528–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1758637.
Kelly, P. and Lusis, T. (2006). Migration and the Transnational Habitus: Evidence from Canada and the Philippines, Environment and Planning A, 38, 831–47. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37214
Kunz, S. (2016). Privileged mobilities: Locating the expatriate in migration scholarship. Geography Compass, 10(3), 89–101. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/gec3.12253
Levitt, P. and Glick Schiller, N. (2004) Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspectiveon society. International Migration Review 38(3): 1002–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x
Levitt, P. (2021). Column - Depicting migration: what can art do that scholarship cannot? Migration Studies, 9(3), 1562–1567.
McGuirk, P. M., and O'Neill, P. (2016). Using questionnaires in qualitative human geography. In I. Hay (Eds.), Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, (246–273). Oxford University Press.
Munk, M. D., Poutvaara, P., and Foged, M. (2012). Transnational Cultural Capital, Educational Reproduction, and Privileged Positions. Paper presented at Politisk Sociologi seminar, København, Denmark. http://vbn.aau.dk/files/77795470/Transnational_Cultural_Capital_Educational_Reproduction_and_Privileged_Positions_19_06_13_mdm.pdf
Nedelcu, M. (2012). Migrants’ New Transnational Habitus: Rethinking Migration Through a Cosmopolitan Lens in the Digital Age, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,38: 9: 1339–1356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.698203
Nowicka, M. (2013). ‘Positioning strategies of Polish entrepreneurs in Germany: Transnationalizing Bourdieu’s notion of capital’, International Sociology, 28(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580912468919
Nowicka, M. (2015). Bourdieu’s theory of practice in the study of cultural encounters and transnational transfers in migration. MMG Working Paper, (15-01).
Oliver, C. and O'Reilly, K., (2010). A Bourdieusian analysis of class and migration: habitus and the individualising process. Sociology, 44 (1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509351627
Portes, A. (1997). Immigration Theory For a New Century: Some Problems and Opportunities, International Migration Review, 31(4), 799–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839703100402
Predojević-Despić, J. and Penev, G. (2016). Population of Serbia Abroad by Destination Countries: Regional Approach, Bulletin of the Serbian Geographical Society - University of Belgrade – Faculty of Geography, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 83–106. https://doi.org/10.2298/GSGD1602082P
Predojević-Despić, J., Pavlov, T., Milutinović, S. and Balli, B. (2016). Transnational Entrepreneurs in Western Balkans: A comparative Study of Serbian and Albanian Migrants and Returnees, in Return Migration and Regional Development in Europe: Mobility Against the Stream, R. Nadler, Z. Kovács, B. Glorius, and T. Lang, (eds.), London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 111–127.
Pries, L. (2001). The Disruption of Social and Geographic Space: Mexican-US Migration and the Emergence of Transnational Social Spaces, International Sociology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580901016001005
Prieur, A. and Savage, M. (2013). Emerging forms of cultural capital. European Societies 15(2), 246–267. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2012.748930
Rapoport, H., Sardoschau, S. and Silve, A. (2020). Migration and Cultural Change. CESifo Working SSRN Paper No. 8547. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3689469
Ren, N. and Liu, H. (2019). „Domesticating ‘Transnational Cultural Capital’: The Chinese State and Diasporic Technopreneur Returnees.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (13): 2308–27. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1534583
Ryan, L. and R. Sales, M. Tilki and B. Siara (2009). Family Strategies and Transnational Migration: Recent Polish Migrants in London, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830802489176
Robins, D. (2019). Lifestyle migration from the Global South to the Global North: Individualism, social class, and freedom in a centre of „superdiversity”. Population, Space and Place, 25(6) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2236.
Savage, M. and Silva, E. B. (2013). Field Analysis in Cultural Sociology. Cultural Sociology, 7(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975512473992.
Stock, I. and Fröhlich, J.J. (2021). Migrants’ Social Positioning Strategies in Transnational Social Spaces. Social Inclusion, Volume 9 (1), 91–103 DOI: 10.17645/si.v9i1.3584
Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and Power. The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. University of Chicago Press.
Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: reflections on geographies of encounter, Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133308089372
Vasojević, N. A., & Kirin, S. (2019). Life Satisfaction of Returnee Scholarship Holders in Serbia. Stanovništvo, 57(2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV1902071V
Vesković-Anđelković, M. (2019). Potencijalna uloga povratnika kao posrednika u partnerstvu države i visokoobrazovane dijaspore u Srbiji. Odbranjena doktorska disertacija. Beogard: Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Beogradu. https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:20205/bdef:Content/download
Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism, Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge.
Waldinger, R. (2005). Networks and niches: the continuing significance of ethnic connections. In: G. Loury, T. Modood, and S. Teles, eds. Ethnicity, social mobility and public policy: comparing the USA and UK. Cambridge: University Press, 342–362.
Werbner, P. (1999). Global pathways: Working class cosmopolitans and the creation of transnational ethnic worlds, Social Anthropology, 7(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.1999.tb00176.x
Wimmer, A. and Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation-state building, migration and the social sciences, Global Networks, 2(4), 3013–3034. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00043
Zhou, M. (2005). Ethnicity as social capital: community-based institutions and embedded networks of social relations. In: G. Loury, T. Modood, and S. Teles, eds. Ethnicity, social mobility and public policy: comparing the USA and UK. Cambridge: University Press, 131– 159.
Zhou, M. (2009). Contemporary Chinese America: immigration, ethnicity and community transformation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.