Long-term Effects of Low Fertility in the Region of Former Yugoslavia

Keywords: low fertility, the migration cycle model, Yugoslavia, population projections, UN WPP2015

Abstract

After the dissolution of the socialist Yugoslavia (SFRY) in 1991, the quality and availability of demographic and migration statistics in the region as a whole, and especially in some of its parts are deteriorated. In addition, census rounds are not being held regularly throughout the region as of 1991. Thus, producing population projections has become rather challenging in comparison to the period of SFRY. This paper made an effort in order to overcome obstacles in terms of historic data and jump-off projection values for the whole region in accordance with adjusted data from national records.

Until 1991, population of the region had been increasing almost linearly. Although SFRY was characterized by significant sub-regional differences, in terms of the beginning and the pace of demographic transition, the current total fertility rate throughout the region is below 2.1. The aim of the paper is to consider the long-term implications of low fertility and whether in this respect there would be a demographic homogenization of the region. For that purpose, we relied on the UN WPP2015 model used by the UN Population Division for producing its 2015 World Population Prospects. It enabled several important features from the viewpoint of the main tasks of the paper: the methodologically consistent datasets on main demographic indicators, probabilistic approach for modelling and forecasting fertility and mortality, the opportunity to adjust initial datasets for known issues on data quality (Serbia, Kosovo, Bosnia & Herzeg.), and ability to adjust data distribution according to the former administrative division of SFRY. The last one was of particular importance as it allowed us to take into account the well-known diversity of fertility patterns in Serbia (Vojvodina, Central Serbia and Kosovo), and to make a distinction in projection results between the sub-regions differed by the onset and tempo of fertility transition.

The UN concept of post-transition recovery of total fertility rate is lying behind the hypotheses of future TFR. According to the model, Slovenia and Vojvodina has been already entered the post-transitional phase. Central Serbia and Macedonia are first to join them (as of 2020), followed by Croatia and Bosnia & Herzeg. (2025), and Montenegro (2030). However, the fertility transition in Kosovo could last until 2070. The greatest chance (median distribution of the simulated trajectories) is that TFR in the SFRY region will converge to the levels projected for Southern Europe (1.8) in 2100, except in Slovenia (1.89).

Hypotheses on migration in deterministic manner were based on the “migration cycle model” introduced by Fassmann and Reeger (2012), which assume that all of Europe will eventually experience the transition to net immigration. Since the strategic objectives of all governments in the region are consistent when it comes to joining the EU, it is taken as a pivotal condition for a hypothesis on the migration transition. The symbolic turning point in the transition process in the region (2035) implies that the whole region will become the part of the EU by then. Kosovo is assumed to be the only territory not able to achieve the net immigration during the projection horizon.

The greatest chances (median of the distribution) are that the population in the region of SFRY will be reduced by 16.9% between 2015 and 2055, which puts this region among the ones that are going to experience the strongest decrease (over 15%) in global terms ‒ mainly countries of the former Eastern bloc and Japan. According to the median of prediction intervals, a sharp decline is expected in Vojvodina (31.7%), Cent. Serbia (27.2 %), Bosnia & Herzeg. (22.0%), and Croatia (18.9%), which is similar to the countries that were expected to experience the greatest population decrease in the world by 2050 - Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine, and Moldova. The region reversal to the historic population maximum of 1990 seems to be not possible even in conditions of the above replacement fertility. A zone of depopulation emerged along the eastern rim of the EU, which, according to the UN model, is the most prominent depopulation zone in global terms. Prediction intervals indicate that by the mid-century, with the exception of Kosovo, only Slovenia has some chances (35%) to maintain the current population size. However, to return to its maximum population by 2100 some chance has only Slovenia (almost 30%), and only minimal Montenegro (8%), and Kosovo (5%).

Old-age dependency ratio in the SFRY region is likely to double by the mid-century, while the prediction intervals suggest that even a return to the current unfavourable level is ​​outside of the range of possible outcomes throughout the region. It is the most important long-term demographic implication of low fertility. Yet, that rise has its limits. Therefore, the next four decades will be the most challenging period of getting used to the new demographic reality, which in view of the modern concept of population policy (quality before quantity) is not necessarily bad.

One of the conclusions is that the significant increase in the total fertility rate, i.e. up to and around the replacement level of 2.1, which current official projections (Cent. Serbia, Vojvodina, Montenegro, and Croatia) consider as the ultimate objective of population policy, is far beyond the possible outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALHO, J. M. & SPENCER, B. D. (2005). Statistical Demography and Forecasting. New York: Springer.

ALKEMA, L., RAFTERY, A. E. & GERLAND, P. (2013). Ultimate fertility levels: a modified projection method for low fertility countries. Extended abstract for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Population Association of America. http://paa2013.princeton.edu/papers/130805.

ALKEMA, L., RAFTERY, A. E., GERLAND, P., CLARK, S. J., PELLETIER, F., BUETTNER, T. & GERHARD, H. K. (2011). Probabilistic Projections of the Total Fertility Rate for All Countries. Demography 48(3): 815‒839.

BACHE, I., GEORGE, S. & BULMER, S. (2011). Politics in the European Union. New York: Oxford University Press.

BASTEN, S. A., COLEMAN, D. A. & GU, B. (2012). Re-Examining the Fertility Assumptions in the UN’s 2010 World Population Prospects: Intentions and Fertility Recovery in East Asia? (electronic resource). Population Association of America, 2012 Annual Meeting Program, San Francisco (USA), 3-5 May, 2012. http://paa2012.princeton.edu/papers/122426

BERTOCCI, G. & STROZZI, C. (2008). International migration and the role of institutions. Public Choice 137: 81‒102.

BHAS (2013). Labour Force Survey 2013. Thematic Bulletin 09. Sarajevo: Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

BHAS (2016). Census of population, households and dwellings in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2013. Final Results. Sarajevo: Institute for Statistics of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

BOOTH, H. (2006). Demographic forecasting: 1980 to 2005 in review. International Journal of Forecasting 22(3): 547‒581.

CDI IDN (1979). Razvitak stanovništva SR Srbije i promene do 2000. godine. Beograd: Centar za demografska istraživanja Instituta društvenih nauka.

DEMENY, P. (2003). Population policy dilemmas in Europe at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Population and Development Review 29: 1-28.

DION, P. (2012). Evaluating Population Projections: Insights from a Review made at Statistics Canada. Annual meeting of the Population Association of America, San Francisco, 2012. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

GRUPA 484 (2010). Izbeglice u Srbiji – Zaboravljeni u Hrvatskoj? (elektronski izvor). Izveštaj Evropskog saveta za izbeglice i prognanike (ECRE), Centra za mir, pravne savete i psihosocijalnu pomoć – Vukovar. Beograd: Grupa 484. https://grupa484.org.rs/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ECRE-Izbeglice-u-Srbiji-Zaboravljeni-u-Hrvatskoj-2010.pdf

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2014). The 2015 Ageing Report. Underlying Assumptions and Projection Methodologies. Joint Report by DG ECFIN and AWF. European Economy 8. Brussels: European Commission.

EUROSTAT (2016). Eurostat on-line database (electronic resource). Luxembourg: Eurostat. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

FASSMANN, H. & REEGER, U. (2012). ‘Old’ immigration countries in Europe. The concept and empirical examples. In M. Okólski (ed.), European Immigrations: Trends, structures and policy implications (pp. 66‒90). IMISCOE Research Series. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

FASSMANN, H., MUSIL, E., BAUER, R., MELEGH, A. & GRUBER, K. (2014). Longer-Term Demographic Dynamics in South-East Europe: Convergent, Divergent and Delayed Development Paths. Central and Eastern European Migration Review 3(2): 150–172.

FOSDICK, B. K. & RAFTERY, A. E. (2014). Regional probabilistic fertility forecasting by modeling between-country correlations. Demographic Research 30: 1011‒1034.

GOLDSTEIN, J. R., SOBOTKA, T. & JASILIONIENE, A. (2009). The end of lowest-low fertility? Population and Development Review 35(4): 663-700.

GOLLOPENI, B. (2016). Kosovar emigration: Causes, Losses and Benefits. Sociologija i prostor 54(3): 295‒314.

GRIZELJ, M. & AKRAP, A. (2006). Projekcije stanovništva Republike Hrvatske 2004-2051. Zagreb: Državni zavod za statistiku Republike Hrvatske.

JOSIPOVIČ, D. (2016). The Post-Yugoslav Space on a Demographic Crossway: 25 Years after the Collapse of Yugoslavia. Stanovništvo 54(1): 15‒40.

KAS (2013). Kosovo Population Projection 2011–2061 (electronic resource). Pristina: Kosovo Agency of Statistics. http://ask.rks-gov.net/ENG/publikimet/doc_download/1126-kosovo-population-projection-2011-2061.

KEILMAN, N. (2008). European Demographic Forecasts Have Not Become More Accurate Over the Past 25 Years. Population and Development Review 34(1): 137–153.

KIRK, D. (1996). Demographic Transition Theory. Population Studies 50: 361‒387.

KUPISZEWSKI, M. (2006). Migration in Poland in the Period of Transition - the Adjustment to the Labour Market Change. In M. Kuboniwa & Y. Nishimura (Eds.) Economics of Intergenerational Equity in Transnational Economies. Tokyo: Maruzen Co. Ltd.

KUPISZEWSKI M., KUPISZEWSKA, D. & NIKITOVIĆ, V. (2012). Impact of demographic and migration flows on Serbia. Belgrade: International Organization for Migration.

LUTZ, W. (2014). A Population Policy Rationale for the Twenty-First Century. Population and Development Review 40(3): 527‒544.

LUTZ, W., SANDERSON, W. & SCHERBOV, S. (1997). Doubling of world population unlikely. Nature 387(6635): 803–805.

LUTZ, W., SKIRBEKK, V. & TESTA, M. R. (2006). The Low Fertility Trap Hypothesis: Forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006: 167‒192.

MADZEVIC, M., APOSTOLOVSKA-TOSHEVSKA, B. & ILIEV, D. (2013). A Process of Demographic and Economic Polarization in the Republic of Macedonia. Geographica Pannonica 17(2): 37–45.

MARSHALL, E. (2015). Population projections and Demographic Knowledge in France and Great Britain in the Postwar Period. Population and Development Review 41(2): 271‒300.

McDONALD, P. (2006). Low Fertility and the State: The Efficacy of Policy. Population and Development Review 32(3): 485‒510.

MESIĆ, M. & BAGIĆ, D. (2011). Manjinski povratak u Hrvatsku – Studija otvorenog procesa. Zagreb: UNHCR, Predstavništvo u Republici Hrvatskoj.

MULDER, T. J. (2002). Accuracy of the U.S. Census Bureau National Population Projections and Their Respective Components of Change. Population Division Working Paper 50. Washington: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

MYRSKYLA, M., KOHLER, H-P. & BILLARI, F. C. (2009). Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 460(7256): 741‒743.

NEJAŠMIĆ, I. & ŠTAMBUK, M. (2003). Demografsko stanje i procesi u neurbanim naseljima Republike Hrvatske. Društvena istraživanja; časopis za opća društvena pitanja 12(3-4): 469-493.

NIKITOVIĆ, V. (2010). Demografska budućnost Srbije: Imigracija kao izvesnost? Beograd: Službeni glasnik, Institut društvenih nauka.

NIKITOVIĆ, V. (2011). Functional Data Analysis in Forecasting Serbian Fertility. Stanovništvo 49(2): 73‒89.

NIKITOVIĆ, V. (2013). Demografska budućnost Srbije na drugi način. Stanovništvo 51(2): 53‒81.

NIKITOVIĆ, V., BAJAT, B. & BLAGOJEVIĆ, D. (2016). Spatial patterns of recent demographic trends in Serbia (1961-2010). Geografie 121(4): 521‒543.

PENEV, G. (2009). Demografski trendovi u Crnoj Gori od sredine 20. vijeka i perspektive do 2050. godine. Podgorica: Zavod za statistiku Crne Gore.

RAFTERY, A. E., ALKEMA, L., & GERLAND, P. (2014). Bayesian Population Projections for the United Nations. Statistical Science 29(1): 58‒68. DOI: 10.1214/13-STS419

RAŠEVIĆ, M., NIKITOVIĆ, V. & LUKIĆ-BOŠNJAK, D. (2014). How to motivate policy makers to face demographic challenges? Zbornik Matice Srpske za društvene nauke 148(3): 607‒617.

RZS (2014). Projekcije stanovništva Republike Srbije 2011-2041. Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku Srbije.

RZS (2016). Elektronska baza podataka (elektronski izvor). Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku Srbije.

SHAW, C. (2007). Fifty years of United Kingdom national population projections: How accurate have they been? Population Trends 128. Titchfield, Hampshire: Office for National Statistics.

SZRETER, S. (1993). The idea of demographic transition and the study of fertility change. A critical intellectual history. Population and Development Review 19(4): 659‒701.

ŠEVČÍKOVÁ, H., ALKEMA, L. & RAFTERY, A. E. (2015). bayesTFR: An R package for probabilistic projections of the total fertility rate. Journal of Statistical Software 43(1): 1–29.

ŠEVČÍKOVÁ, H., LI, N., KANTOROVÁ, V., GERLAND, P. & RAFTERY, A. E. (2016). Age-Specific Mortality and Fertility Rates for Probabilistic Population Projections (electronic resource). Ithaca: Cornell University Library – arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.05215v1.pdf

ŠEVČÍKOVÁ, H. & RAFTERY, A. E. (2015). bayesLife: Bayesian Projection of Life Expectancy. R package version 3.0-0. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bayesLife

ŠEVČÍKOVÁ, H. & RAFTERY, A. E. (2016). bayesPop: Probabilistic Population Projection. R package version 6.0-1. (electronic resource) http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bayesPop

ŠEVČÍKOVÁ, H., RAFTERY, A. E. & GERLAND, P. (2013). Bayesian Probabilistic Population Projections: Do It Yourself (electronic resource). Annual meeting of Population Association of America, Boston (USA), 1-3 May 2014. http://paa2014.princeton.edu/abstracts/141301

UN (2015a). World Population Prospects – The 2015 Revision. Methodology of the United Nations Population Estimates and projections. New York: United Nations – Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

UN (2015b). World Population Prospects – The 2015 Revision. Key Findings and Advance Tables. New York: United Nations – Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

VAN DE KAA, D. (2006). Temporarily New: On Low Fertility and the Prospect of Pro-natal Policies. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2006: 193‒211.

VAN DYK, S., LESSENICH, S., DENNINGER, T. & RICHTER, A. (2013). The Many Meanings of “Active Ageing”. Confronting Public Discourse with Older People’s Stories. Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques 44(1): 97‒115.

VIDOVIĆ, H. & MARA, I. (2015). Free Movement of Workers, Transitional Arrangements and Potential Mobility from Croatia. Research Report 402 (electronic resource). Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. http://wiiw.ac.at/free-movement-of-workers-transitional-arrangements-and-potential-mobility-from-croatia-dlp-3630.pdf

ŽUPARIĆ-ILJIĆ, D. (2013). Percepcija tražitelja azila u javnosti i medijski prikazi problematike azila u Hrvatskoj. U D. Župarić-Iljić (ur.) Prvih deset godina razvoja sustava azila u Hrvatskoj. Zagreb: Institut za migracije i narodnosti; Centar za mirovne studije; Kuća ljudskih prava.

Published
2016-12-26
How to Cite
Nikitović, V. (2016). Long-term Effects of Low Fertility in the Region of Former Yugoslavia. Stanovništvo, 54(2), 27-58. https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV161115009N
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>